UNDER CONSTRUCTION

David Carpenter, M.D., to head the NTEF’S “Stop 5G USA”.

 

“The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject.” – Marcus Aurelius

CLARK COUNTY SURVEY FORMS

Science

 

Worldwide there are physicians, researchers, scientists and activists who are sounding the warning alarm over the massive installation of 5G technology and the harmful effects of electro-magnetic radiation. Lawsuits have been filed, communities are banning the installations. Disability claims are being awarded. Tel-com companies are bribing residents to permit the installation on their property.

Elected officials and government employees are falling prey to the tel-com propaganda, citing information from the FCC decision of 1996. How many elected officials are getting pay offs from these companies?

From the Environmental Health Trust Organization:

“United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit judges in favor of environmental health groups and petitioners; finds FCC violated the Administrative Procedure Act [emphasis added] and failed to respond to comments on environmental harm.

Today [August 13, 2021 added], the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in the historic case EHT et al. v. the FCC that the December 2019 decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to retain its 1996 safety limits for human exposure to wireless radiation was “arbitrary and capricious. [emphasis added]”

The court held that the FCC failed to respond to “record evidence that exposure to RF radiation at levels below the Commission’s current limits may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer.” Further, the agency demonstrated “a complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation.” The court found the FCC ignored numerous organizations, scientists  and medical doctors who called on them to update limits and the court found the FCC failed to address these issues:

• impacts of long term wireless exposure
• impacts to children,
• the testimony of people injured by wireless radiation,
• impacts to wildlife and the environment
• impacts to the developing brain and reproduction.”

JML Law Wins Appeal in ‘Unprecedented’ Disability Case Against LAUSD For Failure to Accommodate Teacher With Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. 

French court orders 4G antenna switch-off over cow health concerns.

German court finds property owners can be liable for health impacts from base station antennas on their property